Roe v. Wade: Does anyone know what this means?

Posted on January 19, 2012 by JakeMac

As the anniversary of Roe v. Wade approaches us this weekend, I need to make the statement that abortion was murder and illegal prior to Roe v. Wade, abortion was murder and illegal after Roe v. Wade, and abortion is still murder and illegal today.

The law of Nature and Nature’s God, which is operative at all times all throughout the earth, specifically forbids the execution of an innocent life.

Furthermore, the Constitution does not give any court the authority to make law.  Judges can only render opinions that apply only to the parties that are before them.

The disorientation comes in because the government (teamed up with the media and their distortion of the 1st amendment), campaigns against the American people, and the God who has ordained and given the “right” to life.

The point, however, remains that if a man can be convinced his rights do not come from God then he has no secure rights, because he will be forced to rely on himself to assert his rights.  Realizing that he alone cannot assert his rights against an army, man will next need to trust in the government of the army to assert his rights for him.  In our culture there is even those brilliantly moronic students of the “credentialed” elite, who don’t even need guns to force them to think a certain way; just tickle their ears, make some vacuous promises, and presto!, you have a community organized.

I do want to make very clear that a majority of Americans are not in this camp of cultural degenerates. Just recently the “Captain of Criminal Degenerates” Eric Holder and his two-year political prosecution of Mary Susan Pine for holding a sign outside of an abortion clinic ended with the granting of summary judgment by an upright Judge Kenneth L. Ryskamp.  Judge Ryskamp concluded that the government lacked evidence to prove “all three elements of its FACE (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act) claim.” The ruling was a chastisement of Holder for seeking to apply federal law in a clearly unconstitutional manner!

And of course there is the irresolute members of the conservative “clique” like Rick Perry who spoke forcefully stating, “Every life lost to abortion is a tragedy…” However, recently Mr. Perry prayed the following for this abortion obsessed President, who even desires to force you and I to fund abortions by tax: “Father, we pray for our president. We pray for his family. We pray for the safety of his family. We pray that you light his way,” he said. “We pray that you give him wisdom as he deals with the issues that he faces.”

Does that sound like a prayer full of mercy for victims of crime, or mercy for those that perpetrate crime?  A more fitting prayer would align itself with the ancient king and psalmist, David, who said, “For the arms (strength) of the wicked shall be broken: but the Lord upholdeth the righteous.”

The laws against abortion still exist and they still apply to criminals, they are just not being enforced, and why would they be enforced by a President and Attorney General who make it a habit to break laws and use the force of law against those who uphold the law?

American citizens are looking for audacious leadership that will square off with villainous enemies of our Constitution.  A July 2010 Angus Reid opinion poll found 61 percent of Americans saying that abortion should be illegal either in all or only in certain circumstances. So, on the 39th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade, abandon the media message that our nation is “divided” on the issue. It is far more accurate to quote Rev. Frank Pavone who stated, “Our nation is awakening to the fact that Roe’s policy – imposed by a Court rather than voted on by the people’s representatives — has never represented what the majority of Americans think about abortion.”

And I leave you with the fact that even if the people democratically agreed with the ruling it would not change the immutable law of “Thou shalt not Kill.” We the People can no more change law than can the judges we decry.

 

 

 

 

 

Please share with your friends!
Posted in Things to Consider | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Patriotism, Subversion and the National Defense Authorization Act

Posted on January 3, 2012 by JakeMac

“Men in authority will always think that criticism of their policies is dangerous. They will always equate their policies with patriotism, and find criticism subversive.”- Henry Steele Commager

Let’s be dangerous and subversive to tyranny as it shows its ugly head once again.

What is our Federal government becoming? Only what American citizens allow and it is not an issue of force but apathy.  As I reported a few weeks ago, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which was drafted in secret by Sens. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) and passed in a closed-door committee meeting without a single hearing. It passed through both House and Senate, and while we enjoyed Christmas and a New Year Celebration, Obama “reluctantly” signed it, making it the unconstitutional Law of the land.

Included in this Christmas package was a little provision – the worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial provision.  This gives authority to the President, without the hindrance of pesky Article 1 Section 9, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution: “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”

Now he will no longer need to stage or create make believe wars to exercise powers he has already been exercising by targeting American citizens worldwide for state-sponsored assassination with no legal process whatsoever.  Both branches of government ignored the Bill of Rights (5th, 6th and 7th amendments), detailing the proper way to prosecute potential criminals.

As the fearless commander in chief, full of fidelity and love to those he serves (sarcasm), Obama stated, “My administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens … Indeed, I believe that doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a nation.”

A meaningful statement for a purposed criminal, for even if Obama (if his lips are moving he is lying) manages to keeps his word, it will do nothing to stop future administrations from exercising the power to indefinitely detain American citizens without trial.  Or perhaps the purpose of such a statement was to shield the truth on how such language for this augmented power got into the bill.

It may shock you to know it was his administration that demanded this power in the first place. As the bill’s co-sponsor Senator Carl Levin said during a speech on the floor last month, it was the Obama administration that demanded the removal of language that would have precluded Americans from being subject to indefinite detention.

“The language which precluded the application of Section 1031 to American citizens was in the bill that we originally approved…and the administration asked us to remove the language which says that U.S. citizens and lawful residents would not be subject to this section,” said Levin, Chairman of the Armed Services Committee.

Obama’s un-American behavior is disgraceful, and he will get away with as much as We the People allow. It is not time for Americans to walk unobtrusively, but rather embrace controversy, subvert unpatriotic power and trust that “their mischief shall return on their own heads, along with all their violent dealings” (Psalm 7:10).

 

Please share with your friends!
Posted in Constitution Policy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Justice, Furiously and Fast!

Posted on December 13, 2011 by JakeMac

The Hebrew Prophet Isaiah once exclaimed, in terms of eloquence and perpetuity, “Let favor be shown to the wicked, yet will he not learn righteousness: in the land of uprightness will he deal unjustly, and will not behold the majesty of the Lord (see the goodness that was shown).” (parentheses added)

Men such as Eric Holder, though they be human and subject to error, have thrown off the restraint of conscience that Providence has infused into our nature.  While abandoning their own morality, they have sought to prey upon your disposition of compassion and charity toward your fellow men, abusing and taking advantage of your desire to have peace and tranquility.

Last Thursday Eric Holder sat before the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee with a staff.

For nearly a year the attorney General has attempted to avoid accountability for Operation Fast and Furious, a secret ATF program that allowed guns to “walk” into Mexico which then found their way into the arsenals of Mexican drug cartels.

At each stage of this investigation the Obama administration has withheld evidence, heavily redacted documents, harassed whistleblowers, and in the beginning, even denied that any such operation ever took place. More recently the Obama administration even had to formally withdraw a letter it had sent to Congress last February that falsely claimed the ATF didn’t watch guns “walk” into Mexico.

Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), a former chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, brought up this withdrawn document, along with a term that is so rarely heard in political talk these days it would seem to be puzzle most who hear it: impeachment.

Holder was more than likely shocked as the congressman brought impeachment into the dialogue.

Responding to the question of the withdrawn document, Holder stated, “First let me make something very clear, in response to an assertion you made, or hinted at: Nobody in the Justice Department has lied.”

“Then why was the letter withdrawn?” demanded Sensenbrenner.

Holder answered, “The letter was withdrawn because there was information in there that was inaccurate.”

Sensenbrenner demanded, “Tell me what the difference is between lying and misleading Congress in this context?”

Holder replied, “If you want to have this legal conversation, it all has to do with your state of mind, and whether or not you had the requisite intent to come up with something that can be considered perjury or a lie.”

For the coming months as congressional investigators continue to struggle for the truth, the 1,400 or so guns from Fast and Furious, still unaccounted for, will continue to kill people.

What kind of example is this to future generations?  Posterity receives light only as citizens have courage to forsake “favor to the wicked” and covenant with justice upon the terms of He who holds the Divine Scepter of Righteousness.

Isaiah concludes, “When Thy judgments are in the earth, the inhabitants of the world will learn righteousness.”

Impeachment followed by criminal prosecution will be the only action to satisfy divine justice, and restore equity to this country.  Your right to demand this is also your duty to the God who gave the right.

 

 

 

Please share with your friends!
Posted in Biblical American Ethics, On My Mind | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Hegel and Healthcare – Is this all the Religious Leaders got?

Posted on December 1, 2011 by JakeMac

Good old Dictator-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama is “curiously” scratching his head, perhaps asking his boss, George Soros whether or not he should go forward with a proposed regulation under the health care law he signed last year that would force Catholic individuals and institutions to act against the teachings of the Catholic church.

In August, Health and Human Service (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius proposed a regulation that would take affect next fall, which would require all health care plans to cover sterilizations and all FDA-approved contraceptives, including abortifacients. The proposed regulation includes a very narrow religious exemption that does not cover individual Catholics, or Catholic universities, hospitals or charitable institutions.

Meanwhile the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops have called the regulation an “unprecedented attack on religious liberty” and have called on American Catholics to contact HHS and demand that the regulation be rescinded.  Then I ask, is it OK for other health providers to be forced into committing the abominable practice of abortion, or prescribing contraceptives or abortifacients (i.e. morning after pills)?  Shouldn’t we as people of faith be demanding of our government that they stay in the jurisdiction the Constitution delegates to it?

“Indeed, such nationwide government coercion of religious people and groups to sell, broker, or purchase ‘services’ to which they have a moral or religious objection represents an unprecedented attack on religious liberty,” the bishops said in commentary on the proposed regulation they submitted to HHS.

If these bishops would have engaged into the Federal Health Care debate, and encouraged their fellow congregants to do so, they may have prevented this atrocity before it was “birthed”.  Now, with a defeated mentality, by delineating their firepower and argument to “this is a religious attack against Catholics” they have the uphill battle of begging government’s permission to exempt them from something the government had no business to mandate in the first place.

With all due respect this is an unprecedented attack on Americans and the laws of God, regardless of creed. All Catholics should unite with mankind against tyranny because God hates it.

At Tuesday’s press briefing, Jake Tapper of ABC News stated he had heard from pro-abortion Democrats who are worried about where Obama was going on the proposed regulation and asked marionette Jay Carney about its status.

“I’ve heard from a lot of Democrats in the last few weeks who are concerned about President Obama possibly granting an exemption to Catholic churches, hospitals and universities from the requirement that all insurance plans cover contraception,” said Tapper.

“I’m wondering if you could shed any light on this decision,” Tapper asked Carney. ”I know the President has not yet made a decision, but I think these Democrats, a lot of them in the abortion rights community, are concerned that this is even being discussed. Could you explain why the President is considering an exemption, and what’s going into his decision-making?”

“The President has–this decision has not yet been made,” Carney squeaked. ”You can be sure that we want to strike the right balance between expanding coverage of preventive services and respecting religious beliefs.  And that’s the balance that will be sought as this decision is made.”

Listen to this balancing mentality.  Does right need to be balanced?  No, it already is; that’s why it is right.  What Obama is saying is he wants to dilute right with a fair share of wrong, and then cram it down your throat.

Attack the thesis with an antithesis; come up with a synthesis (compromise between the thesis and antithesis); which in turn becomes the new thesis.  This is the balance of deceit and preserves no more than sand for the foundation of a house.

 

 

 

 

Please share with your friends!
Posted in Constitution Policy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Has the ACLU a multi-personality?

Posted on November 25, 2011 by JakeMac

Just after Thanksgiving the ACLU released a shocking article. The worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial provision is in S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which will be on the Senate floor on Monday the 28th. The bill was drafted in secret by Sens. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) and passed in a closed-door committee meeting, without even a single hearing.

The ACLU also reported:

In support of this harmful bill, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) explained that the bill will “basically say in law for the first time that the homeland is part of the battlefield” and people can be imprisoned without charge or trial “American citizen or not.” Another supporter, Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) also declared that the bill is needed because “America is part of the battlefield.”

The purpose of this bill is obvious, as spoken by its supporters, to aggrandize central power.  This is the age-old question, posed by our founders as they deliberated over the Virginia Plan that eventually became the Constitution of the United States. How do you give government enough power to govern effectively, but limit that power so government does not become tyrannical and corrupt, given the fallen nature of man?

This policy if passed would indeed make any power-thirsty dictator foam at the mouth. No doubt our current president and Dictator in Chief would love another opportunity to increase in his monarchal powers that are not found in the Constitution.

Well, now that you got your news I would like to pose a question, what has caused the ACLU to understand that this is an abuse of our liberties?  Was it the Declaration of Independence that declares all men are “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights”?  Would they have us put our trust in the only just and faithful Governor of the Universe, or simply take their word for it because they are not morally corrupt and their judgment is not diluted?

On the ACLU’s website it states:

The ACLU is our nation’s guardian of liberty, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country.

Why does this same group who can come up with a constitutional conclusion, as found in this article, be known as one of the most anti-Christian organizations in our country? Out of the other side of their mouth they favor and prefer secular humanist law and tyranny.

The words of Thomas Jefferson may unravel the confusion and lay before us a straight stick of judgment.

The God who gave us life gave us liberty at the same time… Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed the only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are…the gift of God?  That they are not to violated but with His wrath?

Tyrants do not fear secular organizations more than they fear the God and Creator of their subjects.  Thank you for your input ACLU, now abandon your Godless folly and embrace a “firm reliance on divine providence…” –Declaration of Independence

Please share with your friends!
Posted in Biblical American Ethics, On My Mind | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Is this the mentality of hell?

Posted on November 7, 2011 by JakeMac

Recently a butcher shop abortion center in Orlando, Florida has advertised not only services of murdering infants, but now is offering a coupon so that you can have your infant child murdered at a discount price! On Monday, LifeNews reported that a coupon, promising discount Sunday abortions for a “limited” time only, was issued by the Orlando Women’s Center – as if they were advertising a “fire sale.”

Look for yourself, below is a copy of this coupon:

coupon for an abortion

I can only think that hell itself would condone this type of mentally sick ideology: murder a child like you are going to buy a new pair of shoes.

Being that the moral code of this nation is based on Common Law (7th amendment), and Common Law derives its authority from the Ten Commandments and Hebrew Mosaic institution I will quote a Hebrew King to give validity to my above statement.

“The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.” – Psalm 19:7

Where are our loving, tolerant, open-minded, animal-protecting, environment-policing, free housing/education/healthcare-giving liberals?  I will tell you where, they are printing abortion coupons out on recycled paper, and driving young women to murder their children in battery operated cars!  And most conservatives are happy to sell them the paper and car, and rent out the clinic space.

This is moral depravity on the level of a conscienceless animal.  Remember America, “An injustice done anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” – Martin Luther King

If left unopposed, do not think this will not stop at babies in the womb, nor the defenseless elderly. How in the world can this be, America?  Make your voice heard!  Take one more look below before you decide that you can ignore morality, because immorality is not being ignored.


 

 

Please share with your friends!
Posted in Biblical American Ethics, Things to Consider | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

What political agenda will save our nation’s problems?

Posted on October 29, 2011 by JakeMac

by Jake MacAulay, posted Oct. 29th, 2011

“No King but King Jesus!”

On April 18, 1775, John Adams and John Hancock were at the home of Reverend Clarke. British General Gage was pleading with the colonists to lay down their arms and all would be forgiven, except for Samuel Adams and John Hancock. That same night, Paul Revere arrived to warn them of the approaching Redcoats. The next morning British Major Pitcairn shouted to an assembled regiment of Minutemen; “Disperse, ye villains, lay down your arms in the name of George the Sovereign King of England.” The immediate response of Reverend Jonas Clarke was: “We recognize no Sovereign but God and no King but Jesus!”

That battle cry soon rang throughout the colonies, and the Committees of Correspondence sounded the cry across the Colonies: “NO KING but KING JESUS!”

It must a Biblical agenda.  Here are a few quotes from our founders who laid a political agenda that protected and aided its people so they would be successful.

“The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were…the general principles of Christianity.” — John Adams

Again John Adams states:

We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

The Biblical model for a political agenda is Romans 13:

Vs. 1: Government is known as powers or jurisdictions.

Vs. 2: Gov. is ordained, set up, and established by God

Vs. 3: Gov. is called rulers, first ones, chief ones, and leaders.

Vs. 4: Gov. is called “minister” of God translated from Greek “decones” where we get our word deacon, which means servant.

Vs. 5: Gov. is also called a revenger, an exacter of righteousness.

Vs. 6: Gov. is once again called ministers in the Greek “litugoi” where we get our word liturgy, which is know as a public form of worship.  They are responsible to be God’s liturgy.

Vs. 9: Gov. is to abide and promote God’s law.

Government’s jurisdiction is the sword, a revenger to execute wrath on evildoers.  It is to protect those who abide by the laws.  Government’s purpose is not to solve any problems except crime problems.  If a nation has problems outside of crime or enemies (foreign or domestic), the government and political agendas are not authorized to fix them.  Problems with education, poverty, sickness, etc. are the jurisdiction of churches, volunteer groups, and families.

Psalm 144:10; “It is He that giveth salvation unto kings: who delivereth David His servant from the hurtful sword.”

The political agenda that will solve our nation’s problems is “strong self-government” and a civil government that will protect and promote it.  Politics cannot solve problems, people can.

The way people do is found in Deuteronomy 28:1-2:

And it shall come to pass, if thou shalt hearken diligently unto the voice of the LORD thy God, to observe [and] to do all His commandments which I command thee this day, that the LORD thy God will set thee on high above all nations of the earth: And all these blessings shall come on thee, and overtake thee, if thou shalt hearken unto the voice of the LORD thy God.

 

Please share with your friends!
Posted in Biblical American Ethics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What criteria should a Christian use when he votes?

Posted on October 29, 2011 by JakeMac

by Jake MacAulay, posted Oct. 29th, 2011

Remember to not give your suffrage (vote) to the ungodly (II Chronicles 19:2). Jehoshaphat, a righteous King in Judah, was reproved by God for this very thing. Here’s what was said to the King (who did good himself), “Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the Lord? Therefore is wrath upon thee from before the Lord.”

The Bible clearly tells us how to vote. Exodus 18:21 says, “Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers.” How about the qualifications of that king or ruler?  Deuteronomy 17:15 says, “Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the Lord thy God shall choose; one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee; thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother…”  So we see that God commands us to vote for one who has no allegiance to foreign law or religion.  The Lord commands in verse 17, “Neither shall he multiply wives to himself.” That speaks specifically to marriage and faithfulness to one’s spouse.

Paul speaks to Timothy regarding the qualifications necessary before ordaining a Bishop (overseer, someone with authority).  These same qualifications can be applied to civil leaders as their office is ordained by God, just in a different jurisdiction.

I Timothy 3:2-7a says:

Bishops then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behavior, given to hospitality, apt to teach; Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous; One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?) Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil. Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.

Please share with your friends!
Posted in Biblical American Ethics | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Is there a form of government that the Bible endorses?

Posted on October 29, 2011 by JakeMac

by Jake MacAulay, posted Oct. 29th, 2011

The Bible acknowledges many types of governments. For example, 1 Peter 2:13-14 says, “Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord’s sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme; Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by Him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well.”

Ordinance (Kitisis): the act of founding or establishing the thing created.  Peter is referring to the TYPE of government. This includes a king (or monarchy) like David, or a Republic like we have in America, and what Israel enjoyed before they sinned and desired a king.  Peter was not concerned (neither is God) about the form of the government system; the Bible is only specific to the function of government, “the punishment of evildoers.”

Notice that God can bless a monarchy, as in the case of David, Hezekiah, Josiah, etc., or He may curse the monarchy in the case of Ahab, Manasseh, or Saul.  The reason for pleasure or displeasure of God is not found in the type of government, but rather in the actions of the government.  If government fails to “punish evildoers” as Peter states here, or Paul states in Romans 13, then government may expect the curse of God. And we all know as our government is blessed or cursed, so are we as citizens of that government.

In 1 Samuel chapter 8 we see the children of Israel prospered and became complacent as a Republic comprised of different tribes with no king to govern them, only law and rulers of select demographics. “Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers of thousands, and rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens” (Exodus 18:21). As a result of this complacency they desired to give up their autonomy (which represents responsibility) and adopted a new form of government: a monarchy.  1 Samuel 8:5 says, “…make us a king to judge us like all the nations”.  They wanted a king that would take care of them. We don’t want the responsibility of God’s government, which would require us keeping up the standard of God in our own lives and our elected leaders lives all the time. Verses 19-20 says, “… we will have a king over us; That we also may be like all the nations; and that our king may judge us, and go out before us, and fight our battles.”

The sin was not the form of government, the sin was found in verse 7; “…they have rejected Me, that I should not reign over them.” In other words, they weren’t interested in their government upholding the judgments of God (the Lord is known by the judgment which He executes: Psalm 9:16), they were interested in what they could get out of government.

Please share with your friends!
Posted in Biblical American Ethics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Constitution Class Graduation

Posted on October 28, 2011 by JakeMac

The classes on the Constitution have really been eye opening for me. I am 84 years old, and didn’t pay much attention in high school civics class, or in 66 years since then, to governmental things.

Now, I realize our nation is floundering, and politics are getting more and more corrupt. It is imperative that we wake up before our foundational freedoms are taken away.

These classes have opened up a whole new dimension for me, and I am hopeful that my church will also sign up for these informative classes.  –Betty Shumach

It is an awesome fulfillment to be a part of societal transformation for the Kingdom of God.  The above referral was given by one of my more active students and she is 84! I have been thoroughly honored and blessed to not only learn the resources of the Institute on the Constitution but also in less than two short years to instruct four 12-week courses.

The Jesus People Church in Minnesota sponsored our most recent course and the pastor and co-pastor were among the graduates.  This prompted a 6-week Wednesday night bible series in the Church titled “Politics and the Bible”. I would encourage every Pastor in the country to sponsor an IOTC course!

Just last week we had the honor of having Michael Anthony Peroutka fly out to Minnesota to graduate our recent class of Constitutionalists. Our youngest graduate was 6 and the oldest 84. Many people came that evening that were not graduating, but signed up for the next class after the conclusion of the service!

Michaels dedication and commitment to His God and this nation is sincere and was demonstrated when he spoke. There was not one person in the room that did not get to talk with him, shake his hand, or receive the most genuine encouragement a leader can give to those he instructs.

Here is some of the feedback.

“Eye opening, very solid!”

“The presuppositions validated the grievances, I had never saw it that way until he said it, thank you Michael”

“Michael coming to finish off the coarse was a perfect touch.”

“Separation of God and Government, that’s what they are saying, you put words to it.”

One thing is certain following this graduation in Minnesota; these words are translating to conversion, ownership, and strict accountability of our Government body in these United States!

http://constitutioncourse.com/

 

Please share with your friends!
Posted in Constitution Policy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment